0 of 4 Questions completed
Questions:
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You must first complete the following:
Quiz complete. Results are being recorded.
0 of 4 Questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 point(s), (0 )
Earned Point(s): 0 of 0 , (0 )
0 Essay(s) Pending (Possible Point(s): 0 )
Show Question
1
Show Question
2
Show Question
3
Show Question
4
Review
Answered
Correct
Incorrect
Question 1 of 4
A protocol is described in Lesson 1.3.1 as a “scientific contract”, a living promise made before any data is examined. Which of the following statements most precisely captures what makes a protocol a contract rather than merely a planning document?
Question 2 of 4
Lesson 1.3.1 introduces three international frameworks that set the global standard for evidence-synthesis protocols. Which option correctly identifies all three frameworks AND the review type each is most strongly associated with?
Question 3 of 4
PRISMA-P contains 17 items grouped into three sections, Administrative Information, Introduction, and Methods. The Administrative Information section (Items 1–5) covers title, registration, authors, amendments, and funding/conflicts of interest. According to Station 1.3, these administrative items are “housekeeping”, procedural requirements that do not affect the scientific quality of the review.
Question 4 of 4
A research team is drafting a protocol on cognitive behavioural therapy for adolescent anxiety. In the Rationale section (PRISMA-P Item 6), they write: “Anxiety disorders affect a significant proportion of adolescents worldwide, with substantial impact on academic and social functioning. Cognitive behavioural therapy has been studied widely as a treatment option. This review will explore the available evidence on CBT for adolescent anxiety.” A peer reviewer responds: “The rationale does not justify the review.” Using Lesson 1.3.3, identify what is specifically missing.